<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was Adam for real life?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joshphilpot.com/2009/09/21/was-adam-for-real-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joshphilpot.com/2009/09/21/was-adam-for-real-life/</link>
	<description>Honoring the passé</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:42:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://joshphilpot.com/2009/09/21/was-adam-for-real-life/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshphilpot.com/?p=171#comment-76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Josh,

I am with you on this point. The view that Longman presents is untenable in my opinion. To go with your implications, such a view causes significant challenges for what it means for Christ to be the Second Adam (Rom 5).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh,</p>
<p>I am with you on this point. The view that Longman presents is untenable in my opinion. To go with your implications, such a view causes significant challenges for what it means for Christ to be the Second Adam (Rom 5).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

